摘要:苏力教授的《窦娥的悲剧——传统司法中的证据问题》一文存在着两处明显的硬伤:一是小学音乐教育论文不明白版本变迁,错把后人改动的剧本当作关汉卿所作,造成了失实;二是小学音乐教育论文由于不能正确把握元杂剧的艺术特质,对关目情节进行了过度的文本细读,以至于过分泥实,混淆了文学作品与史料的界线。 关键词:失实;泥实 Abstract: The paper of Professor Suli, whose title is The Tragedy of Dou E: The Problem of Evidence in Traditional Chinese Justice, has two evident problems. Firstly, he didn't understand the change of the editions. He looked on the changed drama by the other people as the one by Guan Han-qing himself. This is improperly. Secondly, he didn't grasp the characters of art correctly .He read the drama too nibblely, confused the limit of literary works and h
|